BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION, INC.
v.
ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; JOHNSON MOTOR LINES, INC. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; LORCH-WESTWAY CORP. ET AL. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; UNITED STATES ET AL. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; BUCKLEY ET AL. V. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS; LEWIS V. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS; INFELICE V. UNITED STATES; WARD V. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC CO.; PLACID OIL CO. ET AL. V. LOUISIANA ET AL.; TEXACO INC. V. LOUISIANA ET AL.; ALEXANDER ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA; HARSANY V. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL.
BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION, INC.
ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; JOHNSON MOTOR LINES, INC. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; LORCH-WESTWAY CORP. ET AL. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; UNITED STATES ET AL. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; BUCKLEY ET AL. V. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS; LEWIS V. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS; INFELICE V. UNITED STATES; WARD V. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC CO.; PLACID OIL CO. ET AL. V. LOUISIANA ET AL.; TEXACO INC. V. LOUISIANA ET AL.; ALEXANDER ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA; HARSANY V. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL.
420 U.S. 956
Supreme Court of the United States (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
United States ex rel. Gregory A. Thomas v. Cuyler, 548 F.2d 460 (3d Cir. 1977)…. United States v. Payne, 492 F. 2d 449 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 876, 95 S.Ct. 138, 42 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974); United States v. Infelice, 506 F. 2d 1358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107, 95 S.Ct. 778, 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1974), reh. denied, 420 U.S. 956, 95 S.Ct. 1342, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1974); United States v. Insana, 423 F. 2d 1165 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841, 91 S.Ct. 83, 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970). . United States v. Fiore, 443 F. 2d 112 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 984, 93 S.Ct. 15…
-
Appleyard's Motor Transp. Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 592 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1979)…); Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission, 383 U.S. 607, 619-620, 86 S.Ct. 1018, 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966). In Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285, 95 S.Ct. 438, 442, 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956, 95 S.Ct. 1340, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975), the Court, in applying the arbitrary and capricious standard, stated: Under the “arbitrary and capricious” standard the scope of review is a narrow one. A reviewing court must “consider whether the decision wa…
-
Monongahela Power Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 640 F.2d 504 (4th Cir. 1981)…eview is a narrow one. The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.’ ” Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285, 95 S.Ct. 438, 441, 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), rehearing denied, 420 U.S. 956, 95 S.Ct. 1340, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975).5 Monongahela makes the point that the brief average agreement between it and the B&O simply adopts the General Car Demur-rage Rules and Charges, without spelling out any differences as to when and whether demu…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence