BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION, INC.
v.
ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; JOHNSON MOTOR LINES, INC. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; LORCH-WESTWAY CORP. ET AL. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; UNITED STATES ET AL. V. ARKANSAS-BEST FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL.; BUCKLEY ET AL. V. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS; LEWIS V. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS; INFELICE V. UNITED STATES; WARD V. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC CO.; PLACID OIL CO. ET AL. V. LOUISIANA ET AL.; TEXACO INC. V. LOUISIANA ET AL.; ALEXANDER ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA; HARSANY V. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL.

U.S. | 1975-02-24
Nos. 73-1055; No. 73-1069; No. 73-1070; No. 73-1071; No. 73-1072; No. 74-313; No. 74-314; No. 74-407; No. 74-435; No. 74-629; No. 74-638; No. 74-5005; No. 74-5614
420 U.S. 956 Supreme Court of the United States (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (13 total)

  • …. United States v. Payne, 492 F. 2d 449 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 876, 95 S.Ct. 138, 42 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974); United States v. Infelice, 506 F. 2d 1358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107, 95 S.Ct. 778, 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1974), reh. denied, 420 U.S. 956, 95 S.Ct. 1342, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1974); United States v. Insana, 423 F. 2d 1165 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841, 91 S.Ct. 83, 27 L.Ed.2d 76 (1970). . United States v. Fiore, 443 F. 2d 112 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 984, 93 S.Ct. 15…
  • …); Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission, 383 U.S. 607, 619-620, 86 S.Ct. 1018, 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966). In Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285, 95 S.Ct. 438, 442, 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), reh’g denied, 420 U.S. 956, 95 S.Ct. 1340, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975), the Court, in applying the arbitrary and capricious standard, stated: Under the “arbitrary and capricious” standard the scope of review is a narrow one. A reviewing court must “consider whether the decision wa…
  • …eview is a narrow one. The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.’ ” Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 285, 95 S.Ct. 438, 441, 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974), rehearing denied, 420 U.S. 956, 95 S.Ct. 1340, 43 L.Ed.2d 433 (1975).5 Monongahela makes the point that the brief average agreement between it and the B&O simply adopts the General Car Demur-rage Rules and Charges, without spelling out any differences as to when and whether demu…

Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw