MARKS
v.
FLORIDA
MARKS
FLORIDA
420 U.S. 959
Supreme Court of the United States (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (U.S. 1976)…enroll members of the class and subclass represented by appellees. The Secretary appealed directly to this Court.6 We noted probable jurisdiction. Weinberger v. Diaz, 416 U. S. 980. After hearing argument last Term, we set the case for reargument. 420 U. S. 959. We now consider (1) whether the District Court had jurisdiction over Espinosa’s claim; (2) whether Congress may discriminate in favor of citizens and against aliens in providing welfare benefits; and (3) if so, whether the specific discriminatory p…
-
Kalina v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 541 F.2d 1204 (6th Cir. 1976)…scal resources cannot be accomplished “by drawing invidious classifications.” Miller v. Laird, 349 F.Supp. 1034, 1046 (3 judge ct. D.C.1972); Diaz v. Weinberger, 361 F.Supp. 1, 11 (3 judge ct. S.D.Fla. 1973) (Set for reargument in the Supreme Court, 420 U.S. 959, 95 S.Ct. 1346, 43 L.Ed.2d 436). 397 F.Supp. 867. Accordingly, he held that the grant of benefits to wives, but not to husbands, without a showing of dependency, served only administrative convenience, and that this purpose was insufficient to avoi…