INTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTION CORP. ET AL.

v.

WALTER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. Lemon, 550 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …sh the validity of the search. Statements elicited prior to the giving of Miranda warnings may be used during a motion to suppress to show defendant’s consent to a search. United States v. Garcia, 496 F. 2d 670, 674-75 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 960, 95 S.Ct. 1347, 43 L.Ed.2d 436 (1975).8 EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL Finally, appellant maintains that he was denied reasonably effective assistance of counsel due to the failure of his trial counsel to effectively argue against the introductio…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Robinson, 625 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …to a finding that [*1219] consent to search was voluntarily given. United States v. Tobin, 576 F. 2d 687, 693 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1051, 99 S.Ct. 731 (1978); United States v. Garcia, 496 F. 2d 670, 674-75 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 960, 95 S.Ct. 1347, 43 L.Ed.2d 436 (1975). . The magistrate appears to have discounted Robinson’s testimony that Markonni told Robinson that Markonni would “need to” conduct a search, and we will not disturb that credibility finding. See United States…
• United States v. Henry, 604 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …ed at this point. As a general rule, routine questioning and searches at the border do not place a person “in custody” within the meaning of Miranda. United States v. McCain, supra; United States v. Garcia, 496 F. 2d 670 (5 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 960, 95 S.Ct. 1347, 43 L.Ed.2d 436 (1975); United States v. Salinas, supra. Judge Bell in Salinas stated the general rule as follows: “Thousands of persons enter the country daily and are subject to some degree of detention while their luggage is searc…