AUSTIN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Youakim v. Miller, 425 U.S. 231 (U.S. 1976)
  …s.” 374 F. Supp. 1204, 1210 (ND Ill. 1974). The jurisdictional statement filed here expressly challenged the Illinois scheme both on equal protection grounds and on the ground of conflict with the Social Security Act. We noted probable jurisdiction. 420 U. S. 970 (1975). Although the jurisdictional statement as to which we noted probable jurisdiction presented the question of conflict between the Illinois law and the Social Security Act, it appears that the Supremacy Clause claim was not presented to the Di…
• United States v. Ayo-Gonzalez, 536 F.2d 652 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …sions — unlawful but not involuntary — admitted into evidence but obtained without having given the warnings required by Miranda are subject to the harmless error rule.” Id. at 432; accord, Null v. Wainwright, 508 F. 2d 340 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 970, 95 S.Ct. 1964, 44 L.Ed.2d 459 (1975). Our careful review of the record herein, including a reading of the entire trial transcript, convinces us that, even assuming arguendo that the challenged testimony was erroneously admitted, the error was harml…