THOMPSON ET AL.

v.

SHEPPARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Davis, 546 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …ly, mechanically, and at random” from the voter registration list, is entitled to the presumption that it was, in fact, drawn from a representative cross-section of the community. Thompson v. Sheppard, 5 Cir., 1974, 490 F. 2d 830, 833, cert. denied, 420 U.S. 984, 95 S.Ct. 1415, 43 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975). And the magistrates found that it had that effect. In Thompson v. Sheppard, supra, we held that a particular state jury-selection scheme involving the use of computers withstood a constitutional challenge base…
• United States v. Howard "Sonny" Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965); United States v. Goff, 509 F. 2d 825 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 857, 96 S.Ct. 109, 46 L.Ed.2d 83 (1975); Thompson v. Sheppard, 490 F. 2d 830 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 984, 95 S.Ct. 1415, 43 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975). . See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1863(b)(3). This section provides in pertinent part: (b) Among other things, such [juror selection] plan shall— (3) specify detailed procedures to be followed by the jury commission or cl…
• Bond v. Stanton, 630 F.2d 1231 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …nt for plaintiffs and ordered defendants to submit a plan for implementation of an EPSDT program. 372 F.Supp. 872 (N.D. Ind.1974). This court affirmed, 504 F. 2d 1246 (7th Cir. 1974) (“Bond I”), and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. 420 U.S. 984, 95 S.Ct. 1415, 43 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975). Subsequently, in an unpublished order, the district court assessed attorney’s fees against defendants in their official capacities for time spent by plaintiffs in obtaining the summary judgment in the district…