MURPHY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Freeman, 685 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …v. Hare, 589 F. 2d 1291, 1293-96 (6th Cir. 1979); United States v. Bills, 555 F. 2d 1250, 1251 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Sifuentes, 504 F. 2d 845, 848 (4th Cir. 1974); United States v. Cooks, 493 F. 2d 668, 672 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 996, 95 S.Ct. 1437, 43 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975) (analyzing plain view seizures of contraband in terms of existence or absence of inadvertent discovery.). The cases cited aptly demonstrate the confused state of the law. Despite the analysis of inadvertence i…
• United States v. Bruton, 647 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …. 2d 781, 787-91 (9th Cir. 1974) (defendant was armed in a prior incident, and when arrested turned toward house and yelled “it’s the police”; insufficient to justify search); United States v. Cooks, 493 F. 2d 668, 672 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 996, 95 S.Ct. 1437, 43 L.Ed.2d 679 (1975) (presence of two men with guns and “mere possibility” of others insufficient); United States v. Gamble, 473 F. 2d 1274, 1276-77 (7th Cir. 1973) (information that defendant possessed firearm and “rustling noises”…
• United States v. Hamilton, 792 F.2d 837 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …n to the room and stated that it was not his); United States v. Murphy, 506 F. 2d 529, 530 (9th Cir.1974) (per curiam) (possessor of key to warehouse could give consent even though he had key only when performing work on the premises), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 996, 95 S.Ct. 1433, 43 L.Ed.2d 676 (1975). Hamilton argues that the agents could not reasonably rely on Cosbie’s authority to consent because she did not know who ultimately owned the motor home. We disagree. Knowledge of ultimate ownership is not a ne…