HORNE
v.
UNITED STATES; TRIGG V. TENNESSEE

U.S. | 1975-03-24
Nos. 74-5436; No. 74-5816
420 U.S. 998 Supreme Court of the United States (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Jenkins, 701 F.2d 850 (10th Cir. 1983)
    …mith v. Mabry, 564 F. 2d 249, 251-52 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 907,98 S.Ct. 1456, 55 L.Ed.2d 499 (1978); Trigg v. Tennessee, 507 F. 2d 949, 953 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 938, 95 S.Ct. 1148, 43 L.Ed.2d 414, rehearing denied, 420 U.S. 998, 95 S.Ct. 1439, 43 L.Ed.2d 680 (1975). Here we find that the delay of some sixteen months complained of between indictment and arrest is clearly sufficient to provoke an inquiry into the other factors identified by the Court in Barker. The second fa…
  • United States v. Garner, 529 F.2d 962 (6th Cir. 1976)
    …of the defendant which the right to a speedy trial was designed to protect is the possible impairment of a defense. Trigg v. Tennessee, 507 F. 2d 949, 954 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 938, 95 S.Ct. 1148, 43 L.Ed.2d 414, rehearing denied, 420 U.S. 998, 95 S.Ct. 1439, 43 L.Ed.2d 680 (1975). Generalized assertions of an inability to defend do not suffice to establish that the lack of a speedy trial caused prejudice. In addition, Barker mandates that the other interests of the defendant in the right…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw