IN RE DISBARMENT OF MARDIAN

Citator

Cited By

• THE Florida BAR v. Prior, 330 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1976)
  …or suspension of any attorney who (1) has resigned from the bar of another court, or (2) has been convicted of a misdemeanor . . . .” [Emphasis supplied] Our rule is set out in 32 F.S.A. at 86 (1975-76 Pocket Part). . In re Disbarment of Mitchell, 420 U.S. 1001, 95 S.Ct. 1442, 43 L.Ed.2d 759 (filed March 31, 1975). See also Barnes v. Lyons, 187 F. 881, 885-86 (9th Cir. 1911) ; In re Kirby, 84 F. 606 (D.S.D.1898). . The 1969 change from Rule 11.08(3) to Rule 11.07(3) was described to the Court in the Bar’s…
• United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …ourt. We, therefore, proceed on the assumption that our affirmance of his conviction does not moot the present point. See In re Ming, 469 F. 2d 1352, 1354 (7th Cir.1972). . Additionally relevant is the action of the Supreme Court in In re Mitchell, 420 U.S. 1001, 95 S.Ct. 1442, 43 L.Ed.2d 759 (1975), in suspending an attorney from practice there and issuing an order that he show cause why he should not be disbarred. As Friedland points out, 502 F.Supp. at 616 n. 9, the Supreme Court’s suspension was apparen…