BARNES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Carter, 528 F.2d 844 (8th Cir. 1975)
  ….Ct. 142, 42 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974). However, this court must nevertheless also conclude that such activities prejudiced the defendant before a new trial may be ordered on such grounds. Gant v. United States, 506 F. 2d 518 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1005, 95 S.Ct. 1449, 43 L.Ed.2d 764 (1975); United States v. Schrenzel, 462 F. 2d 765 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 984, 93 S.Ct. 325, 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972); United States v. Dunmore, supra; Woodring v. United States, supra, 311 F. 2d 417 (8th Cir.)…
• United States v. Carlton Eugene Martin, 706 F.2d 263 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …that the men were only on trial for the acts charged in the indictment. The charge also made it clear to the jury that all factual matters were submitted to their determination. Gant v. United States, 506 F. 2d 518, 520 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1005, 95 S.Ct. 1449, 43 L.Ed.2d 764 (1975). Based upon our review of the record we are left with the firm impression that the judge’s inappropriate comment was the product of mistake, not impermissible pros-ecutorial advocacy or one-sidedness. We also b…