BELL

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Atkins v. Parker, 472 U.S. 115 (U.S. 1985)
  …Since the Department contends that the particular errors committed were unknown to it, however, it is not clear how they would be detected absent specific notice to the recipients. See Vargas v. Trainor, 508 F. 2d 485, 490 (CA7 1974), cert. denied, 420 U. S. 1008 (1975). Because the Department notably does not contend that every error that occurred in this case has in fact been detected, the Court of Appeals’ order directing the Department “to check its files to ensure that [it] properly calculated the benef…
• United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …availability and feasibility of alternative enforcement methods, and the immediate and long-range consequences of self- or non-self-execution. People of Saipan v. United States Department of Interior, 502 F. 2d 90, 97 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1008, 95 S.Ct. 1445, 43 L.Ed.2d 761 (1975). With these principles in mind, we proceed to examine the treaty provision in issue here, article 6 of the Convention on the High Seas. Article 6 declares the exclusivity of a nation’s jurisdiction over the ves…
• Friends OF THE Earth v. Carey, 552 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …hold that the City has waived its right to assert these contentions and is precluded by § 307(b)(2) of the Act from raising them in an enforcement proceeding instituted under § 304. See Vargas v. Trainor, 508 F. 2d 485 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1008, 95 S.Ct. 1454, 43 L.Ed.2d 767 (1975) (waiver by state welfare official of state’s Eleventh Amendment rights). Our modification of our mandate to permit the City to raise constitutional issues was not designed to permit the City to attack the Plan…