STONE

v.

CHICHESTER

Citator

Cited By

• Moultrie v. Davis, 498 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …. Here, Moultrie had a legal right to request and to vote to terminate the police chief and it was one of his official duties, under the city charter, to do so. Additionally, under Piver v. Stallman, 198 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 201 So. 2d 897 (Fla.1967), the allegation is also insufficient, since the electorate’s objection is really to an act of the city commission as a whole, rather than an individual act of a commissioner. Consequently, a city councilman cannot be recalled from office…
• Gordon v. Leatherman, 450 F.2d 562 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …on called for that purpose.” . Joyner v. Shuman, Fla.App.1959, 116 So. 2d 472; Hines v. Dozer, Fla.App. 1961, 134 So. 2d 548; Tolar v. Johns, Fla.App.1962, 147 So. 2d 196; Piver v. Stallman, Fla.App.1967, 198 So. 2d 859, cert. den. without opinion, 201 So. 2d 897 (Fla.1967). . “In Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education, 5th Cir. 1961, 294 F. 2d 150, 155, the principle was stated thus: ‘Whenever a governmental body acts so as to injure an individual, the Constitution requires that the act be consonant wit…

Authorities Cited

• Stone v. Chichester, 198 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)