WILLIAMS-MCWILLIAMS INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
HEART-A-TAMPA, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, AND WALTER E. HELLER & COMPANY OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
WILLIAMS-MCWILLIAMS INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
HEART-A-TAMPA, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, AND WALTER E. HELLER & COMPANY OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
201 So. 2d 920
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by Appellant, Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc., from a final decree adverse to it.
We have carefully examined the voluminous testimony, and the law presented by the briefs filed herein.
The courts of this State have consistently held that where the record reveals competent, substantial evidence to support the trial judge’s ruling, and there has been no showing of a misapprehension of the legal effect of the evidence as a whole, that the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law will not be interfered with by this Court.
Affirmed.
SHANNON, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and SILVERTOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sperber v. Murray Berkowitz, 241 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…6] that there was conflicting evidence before the trial court upon each of them. The record reveals competent substantial evidence to support the findings of the trial judge. Williams McWilliams Industries, Inc. v. Heart-a-Tampa, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 201 So. 2d 920. In addition appellants urge that the counterclaim for specific performance should not have been granted because the contract is indefinite, ambiguous and one-sided. We have examined the contract and the evidence submitted upon these issues and fin…