LOUISE GUYTON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• I. v. Anderson, 356 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …v. State, 95 Fla. 737, 116 So. 629 (1928); Davis v. State, 51 Fla. 37, 40 So. 179 (1906); Pells v. State, 20 Fla. 774 (1884); State v. Ward, 354 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Mitchell v. State, 317 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Sifford v. State, 202 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Haines v. State, 113 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959). It is said that requiring such allegation and proof as thus particularized not only is essential to establishing the element of “ownership,” but also protects the defendant from…
• Llano v. State, 271 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
  …r lessee and that it was not fatal for the State to fail to establish the corporate structure of Air Canada, a Crown Corporation. The premises were fully identified so that there is no possibility of double jeopardy. Sifford v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So. 2d 14. In addition, it was proved that appellant placed a bomb in the office located at 6988 Collins Avenue, [*36] Miami Beach, which was the city ticket office of Air Canada. We hold that the charge was proved as to the identity of the property bombed.…
• State v. Ward, 354 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …ished law is that the ownership of the building alleged to have been burglarized is one of the material and substantive elements which must be proved to sustain a burglary conviction. Smith v. State, 96 Fla. 30, 117 So. 377 (1928); Sifford v. State, 202 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Mitchell v. State, 317 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). [*126] There is no evidence in the record which proved or tended to prove that the burglarized structure was owned by Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc. or that it had any po…

Authorities Cited

• Prentiss T. Parrish v. State, 97 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)
• Benny Carroll Taylor v. State, 189 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)