G. P. HODGES AND R. H. HODGES, APPELLANTS,
v.
BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORPORATION, AN OHIO CORPORATION, APPELLEE
G. P. HODGES AND R. H. HODGES, APPELLANTS,
BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORPORATION, AN OHIO CORPORATION, APPELLEE
202 So. 2d 103
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 27 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Carolina Lumber Company v. Daniel (Fla.App.1957) 97 So.2d 156; Meola v. Sparks, 138 Fla. 364, 189 So. 408.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Rhea v. The Dist. Bd. OF Trs. OF Santa FE Coll., 109 So. 3d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…us, and other equitable or legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed.” § 86.011, Fla. Stat. (2009). As the party seeking a declaration of rights, Rhea has the burden to demonstrate entitlement. Groover v. Adiv Holding Co., 202 So. 2d 103, 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). To be entitled to a declaratory judgment, Rhea must demonstrate that (1) a good-faith dispute exists between the parties; (2) he presently has a justiciable question concerning the existence or nonexistence of a right or st…
-
Williams v. Gen. Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…law or shown by the record to be clearly wrong, or against the manifest weight of the evidence, or not supported by competent substantial evidence. General Insurance Co. v. Ramanovski, 443 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Groover v. Adiv Holding Co., 202 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Initially, we conclude that there was no misrepresentation by Mrs. Williams in connection with her insurance renewal application. It is therefore unnecessary for us to determine whether section 627.-409, Florida Statutes (1983)…
-
Gen. Ins. Co. v. Vladimiro Ramanovski, Sr., 443 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…e ... should not be rejected on appeal unless based on a misapplication of law or shown by the record to be clearly wrong, against the manifest weight of evidence, or not supported by competent substantial evidence.” Groover v. Adiv Holding Company, 202 So. 2d 103, 104-105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). We find that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court’s findings are against the manifest weight of evidence. We therefore hold that since it was the insurer’s agent who failed to include Ramanovski’s son…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carolina Lumber Co. v. Daniel, 97 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)
- Meola v. Sparks, 138 Fla. 364 (Fla. 1939)