WIDEMAN, ADMINISTRATOR

v.

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY GAS CO.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …fore the jury a confession of the witness implicating the accused. However, if the witness’s refusal to testify was procured by the accused, no confrontation rights are denied. United States v. Mayes, 512 F. 2d 637, 648-51 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008, 95 S.Ct. 2629, 45 L.Ed.2d 670 [*1359] (1975); cf. Douglas v. Alabama, supra, 380 U.S. at 420, 85 S.Ct. 1074. The Sixth Amendment does not stand as a shield to protect the accused from his own misconduct or chicanery. Diaz v. United States, supra,…
• United States v. Enright, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)
  …that he was paying Enright the sum of $125 a month for his cooperation. These recordings had to be admissible, if at all, under [*983] the conspiracy exception to the hearsay rule.2 In United States v. Mayes, 512 F. 2d 637 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008, 95 S.Ct. 2629, 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975), our circuit recognized what it conceived to be the majority rule of the circuits to the effect that the predicate for admission of the hearsay statement of a co-conspirator is the existence of a “prima facie ca…
• United States v. Sterling Hamilton, 689 F.2d 1262 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …t until there has been an affirmative showing that it has terminated; and its members continue to be conspirators until there has been an affirmative showing that they have withdrawn.” U. S. v. Mayes, 512 F. 2d 637, 642-643 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008, 95 S.Ct. 2629, 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975) citing U. S. v. Etheridge, 424 F. 2d 951, 964 (6th Cir. 1970). The objective of Reid, Wright and Salisbury was to make some easy money, while that of the Hamiltons was to obtain explosives inexpensively. The m…