AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …AT & T to provide the disputed interconnections.17 Bell System Tariff Offerings of Local Distribution Facilities for Use by Other Common Carriers, 46 F.C.C.2d 413, aff’d sub nom. Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 503 F. 2d 1250 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1026, 95 S.Ct. 2620, 45 L.Ed.2d 684 (1975). The FCC held that it had intended to include both FX and CCSA services within the terms “specialized” or “private line” services as those terms were used in the Specialized Common Carriers decision. 46 F.C.C.2d…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 652 F.2d 72 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …ding. Id. at 230, 511 F. 2d at 796. This contention thus posed only a legal question, on which a hearing was obviously unnecessary. That, I submit, is a far cry from the milieu here. . Supra note 129. . 503 F. 2d 1250 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1026, 95 S.Ct. 2620, 45 L.Ed.2d 684 (1975) . . In Gulf States, supra note 129, the Supreme Court interpreted § 204 of the Federal Power Act, 49 Stat. 850, 16 U.S.C. § 824c (1976) [hereinafter cited as codified]. The relevant portion of this statute stat…
• Nat'l Ass'n of Regulatory Util. Comm'rs v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 737 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …A involves a network of private lines linked through switches at a local telephone company’s premises. See Bell System Tariff Offerings, 46 F.C.C.2d 413, 418 n. 5, aff'd sub nom. Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 503 F. 2d 1250 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1026, 95 S.Ct. 2620, 45 L.Ed.2d 684 (1975). The FCC, prior to the set of decisions before us for review, did not require users of private line services to contribute, as ordinary long-distance callers do, to local plant costs allocated to the interstate…

  ← 1 / 2 →