BORUSKI

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Fla., Inc., 116 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …lers Ins. Co., 563 F. 2d 677 (5th Cir.1977); Peterson v. Weinberger, 508 F. 2d 45 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 830, 96 S.Ct. 50, 46 L.Ed.2d 47 (1975); Peter son v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, 508 F. 2d 55, 57-58 (5th Cir.), cert, denied,- 422 U.S. 1043, 95 S.Ct. 2657, 45 L.Ed.2d 694 (1975)). However, the Court then explained the reason for this rule as follows: This Court does not read [the above-cited cases] to extend blanket immunity to Medicare fiscal intermediaries. Rather, a more logical int…
• Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …concept of collateral estoppel bars relitigation of the same facts or issues that were necessarily determined in the prior proceeding. See IB Moore’s Federal Practice . 0.405, 0.441(2); Carr v. United States, 507 F. 2d 191 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1043, 95 S.Ct. 2657, 45 L.Ed.2d 694 (1975); Household Goods Carriers’ Bureau v. Terrell, 452 F. 2d 152 (5th Cir. 1971) (en banc); International Rys. of Central America v. United Fruit Co., 373 F. 2d 408 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 921, 87 S.Ct. 203…
• United States v. Donald E. Belle. Appeal of Donald Belle, 593 F.2d 487 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …use, based on the available background reports as to O’Neil and Roberts, and based on Belle’s actions as well as those of Munford and Roberts, to arrest Belle. Cf. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Hernandez, 508 F. 2d 712 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1043, 95 S.Ct. 2659, 45 L.Ed.2d 695 (1975).18 That being so, the district court did not err in refusing to suppress Belle’s post-arrest statement, albeit the ground on which the district court relied was different than the basis on which we affirm its ru…