UNITED STATES
v.
MILLER

U.S. | 1975-06-30
No. 74-1179
422 U.S. 1054 Supreme Court of the United States (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (U.S. 1976)
  • Norton v. Mathews, 427 U.S. 524 (U.S. 1976)
    …judge now dissenting, adhered to its earlier conclusion in favor of constitutionality. Norton v. Weinberger, 390 F. Supp. 1084 (1975). Appellant has again appealed. We postponed the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits, 422 U. S. 1054 (1975), and, in doing so, cited Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U. S. 749, 763 n. 8 (1975), which just then had been decided. Subsequently, we set the case for oral argument with Mathews v. Lucas, ante, p. 495. 423 U. S. 819 (1975). II The question wheth…
  • Lavine v. Milne, 424 U.S. 577 (U.S. 1976)
    …ble to the applicant would usually come after the 75-day penalty period had passed. Appellant Lavine, the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, appealed pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and we noted probable jurisdiction, 422 U. S. 1054 (1975). We reverse. As with any other welfare scheme, New York Home Relief imposes a host of requirements; and as is the case when applying for most governmental benefits, applicants for Home Relief bear the burden of showing their eligibility [*58…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw