JAMAICA SAVINGS BANK

v.

LEFKOWITZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …innovations and its ability to sell monopolized and competitive products as a system are not unlawful uses of monopoly power, but legitimate advantages of size and integration); Telex Corp. v. IBM, 510 F. 2d 894, 927-28 (10th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 802, 96 S.Ct. 8, 46 L.Ed.2d 244 (1975) (reversing finding of section 2 liability in the absence of predatory conduct). . We reject MCI’s suggestion that our holding in Mishawaka is limited to the unique situation of an alleged price squeeze by an elect…
• Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …t.12 Nevertheless, many anticompetitive [*275] actions are possible or effective only if taken by a firm that dominates its smaller rivals. See Telex Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp., 510 F. 2d 894, 925-26 (10th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 802, 96 S.Ct. 8, 46 L.Ed.2d 244 (1975). A classic illustration is an insistence that those who wish to secure a firm’s services cease dealing with its competitors. See, e. g., Lorain Journal Co., supra. Such conduct is illegal when taken by a monopolist…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Walters v. Nat'l Ass'n of Radiation Survivors, 473 U.S. 305 (U.S. 1985)
  …as imposed, and despite numerous court opinions upholding the validity of the statutory limitation in the face of challenges to its constitutionality (see, e. g., Gendron v. Saxbe, 389 F. Supp. 1303 (C. D. Cal.), aff’d mem. sub nom, Gendron v. Levi, 423 U. S. 802 (1975); Staub v. Roudebush, 574 F. 2d 637 (D. C. Cir. 1978)), it is the Committee’s position that such a view of today’s organized bar, particularly in light of the widespread network of local bar associations that now generally police attorney beha…

  ← 1 / 2 →