AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE CO.

v.

STARNES

Citator

Cited By

• Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1976)
  …judgment holding § 6 (1) unconstitutional and enjoining enforcement thereof. We granted the plaintiffs' application for stay of enforcement of the Act pending appeal. 420 U. S. 918 (1975). Probable jurisdiction of both appeals thereafter was noted. 423 U. S. 819 (1975). For convenience, we shall usually refer to the plaintiffs as “appellants'' and to both named defendants as “appellees.” Ill In Roe v. Wade the Court concluded that the “right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment’s…
• MOE v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, 425 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1976)
  …ppealed from that part of the judgments upholding tax jurisdiction over on-reservation sales of cigarettes by members of the Tribe to non-Indians. We noted probable jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. § 1253 and consolidated the appeal and cross-appeal.3 423 U. S. 819 (1975). Concluding that the District Court had the power to grant injunctive relief in favor of the Tribe, and that it was correct on the merits, we affirm in both cases. I In 1855 an expanse of land stretching across the Bitter Root River Valley…
• Mathews v. Lucas, 427 U.S. 495 (U.S. 1976)
  …red the Secretary to pay benefits for both children. Jurisdictional Statement 28a. The Secretary appealed directly to this Court. 28 U. S. C. § 1252. We noted probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument with Norton v. Mathews, post, p. 524. 423 U.S. 819 (1975). Ill The Secretary does not disagree that the Lucas children and others similarly circumstanced are treated differently, as a class, from those children — legitimate and illegitimate — who are relieved by statutory presumption of any requir…