DAWSON

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Magee, 821 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1987)
  …ot in furtherance of the conspiracy. The phrase “in furtherance of the conspiracy” must not be applied too strictly or the purpose of the co-conspirator exception will be defeated. United States v. James, 510 F. 2d 546, 549 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 835, 96 S.Ct. 105, 46 L.Ed.2d 81 (1975). Ordinarily, a statement that identifies the role of one co-conspirator to another is in furtherance of the conspiracy. United States v. Handy, 668 F. 2d 407, 408 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Patton, 594 F. 2d…
• M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. Int'l Navigation Corp. OF Monrovia, 675 F.2d 525 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …“furnish[ed] no basis for the assertion of an in personam liability of the owner or the attachment of any other vessel owned by International.” M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. International Navigation Corp., 510 F. 2d 451, 452-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 835, 96 S.Ct. 60, 46 L.Ed.2d 53 (1975). On January 9, 1975, the Hanseatic Provincial Court of Appeals in Germany dismissed Zack’s claim against International, finding that the written extension of time to sue from February 16 to May 15, 1961 given to Z…