MAGEE

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Advanced Mobilehome Sys., Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Joseph W. Scott, 663 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …air grooming and appearance, provided that the regulations are not discriminatory or pretextual so as to otherwise constitute a violation of the employees’ civil rights. See Brown v. D.C. Transit System, Inc., 523 F. 2d 725 (D.C.Cir.); cert. denied, 423 U.S. 862, 96 S.Ct. 121, 46 L.Ed.2d 91 (1975). In Brown, terminated employees challenged their employer’s regulations requiring that bus drivers be clean shaven, clean and neat, clothed in full regulation uniform and permitting drivers to wear moustaches but…
• United States v. Reyes Vargas, 583 F.2d 380 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …e the Government contends that “on the evidence it was not a close case” (Br. 16), that contention is true only if Vargas was found unbelievable as a witness. In United States v. Marrero, 486 F. 2d [*388] 622, 627 (7th Cir. 1973), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 862, 96 S.Ct. 120, 46 L.Ed.2d 90, this Court noted that testimony that a defendant “was considered a major narcotics violator by a federal law enforcement agency could only have had a devastating effect on his credibility.” Regrettably, the prejudice in…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Medina-Herrera, 606 F.2d 770 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …ming that the trial court correctly determined that the error was prejudicial, the test to be applied in determining the propriety of another trial was enunciated by this court in United States v. Marrero, 516 F. 2d 12 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 862, 96 S.Ct. 120, 46 L.Ed.2d 90: Our impression then, is that the test to be applied in cases wherein prosecutorial misconduct is alleged is simply whether the accused was insured of and accorded the genuine fairness to which he was entitled during th…