IN RE DISBARMENT OF NELSON

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …29 This demonstration can be made only by reference to the voir dire. In “extreme circumstances,” however, prejudice to the defendant’s rights may be presumed. Calley v. Callaway, 519 F. 2d 184, 204 (5th Cir. 1975), (en banc) (dictum), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 888, 96 S.Ct. 182, 46 L.Ed.2d 119 (April 5, 1976).30 Appellants urge that this exception applies to their case and that the District Court committed reversible error by denying their pre- voir dire motions31 for a continuance or a change of venue. The…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Panko v. Rodak, 606 F.2d 168 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …without change, along with a motion to dispense with the printing requirements. In the motion to dispense with printing as to the petition for certiorari Panko relied on the fact that a similar motion was granted by the Court in Calley v. Callaway, 423 U.S. 888, 96 S.Ct. 182, 46 L.Ed.2d 119 (1975), cert. denied sub nom. Calley v. Hoffman, 425 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 1505, 47 L.Ed.2d 760 (1976), and stated that he had a January 5, 1977 deadline to meet for filing a petition in the Illinois Supreme Court. This mo…

  ← 1 / 2 →