TALLANT ET AL.

v.

HENSON, U. S. MARSHAL, ET AL.; AND DUNN V. CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1976)
  …an officer. Petitioner and several other police officers filed affidavits essentially denying the truth of these charges. The District Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment.2 The Court of Appeals affirmed,3 and we granted certiorari, 423 U. S. 890. The questions for us to decide are (1) whether petitioner’s employment status was a property interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,4 and (2) assuming that the explanation for his discharge was false, whether that…
• Lodge 76, Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO v. Wis. Emp. Relations Comm'n, 427 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1976)
  …l to accept overtime assignments . . . The Wisconsin Circuit Court affirmed and entered judgment enforcing the Commission’s order. The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the Circuit Court. 67 Wis. 2d 13, 226 N. W. 2d 203 (1976). We granted certiorari, 423 U. S. 890 (1975). We reverse. I "The national . . . Act . . . leaves much to the states, though Congress has refrained from telling us how much. We must spell out from conflicting indications of congressional will the area in which state action is still per…
• Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 425 U.S. 662 (U.S. 1976)
  …The Commission and the NAACP each petitioned for certiorari, and we granted both petitions in order to consider the scope of the Commission’s authority to deal with discriminatory employment; practices on the part of the companies that it regulates. 423 U. S. 890. II The question presented is not whether the elimination of discrimination from our society is an important national goal. It clearly is. The question is not whether Congress could authorize the Federal Power Commission to combat such discriminat…