CANNEY

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• State v. Kemp, 429 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …rt must still de [*825] termine if the officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant. If so, the search incident to arrest was justified. See Canney v. State, 298 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), cert, denied, 310 So. 2d 743 (Fla.), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 892, 96 S.Ct. 188, 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975). Since the suppression order was based solely on the premise of an arrest under an illegal ordinance, we must vacate that order. Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal of the loitering charge, vacate the order sup…
• Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Jong HA Wang et ux., 450 U.S. 139 (U.S. 1981)
  …heir children so as to entitle them to discretionary relief under the Act. The Board noted that a mere showing of economic detriment is not sufficient to establish extreme hardship under the Act. See Pelaez v. INS, 513 F. 2d 303 (CA5), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 892 (1975). This was particularly true since respondents had “significant financial resources and there [was] nothing to suggest that the college-educated male respondent could not find suitable employment in Korea.” With respect to the claims involvi…
• Briggs v. Goodwin, 569 F.2d 10 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …); and Davidson v. Kane, 337 F.Supp. 922, 924 (E.D.Va.1972). Several tribunals have noted the issue, but reserved decision. See, e. g., Holodnak v. Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Div., [*18] Stratford, Conn., 514 F. 2d 285, 292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892, 96 S.Ct. 188, 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975), and Wahba v. New York University, 492 F. 2d 96, 103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 874, 95 S.Ct. 135, 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974). In this case, the District Court may eventually have to resolve the question of…