APPALACHIAN POWER CO.
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA

U.S. | 1975-10-20
No. 75-207
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.
423 U.S. 908 Supreme Court of the United States (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 124 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (62 total)

  • Stogniew v. McQUEEN, 656 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1995)
    …7) (“One not a party to a suit is in privity with one who is where his interest in the action was such that he will be bound by the final judgment as if he were a party.”); Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew, 511 F. 2d 710, 719 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 210, 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975) (“A person may be bound by a judgment even though not a party if one of the parties to the suit is so closely aligned with his interests as to be his virtual representative.”). While Stogniew was clearly interest…
  • Pearce v. Sandler, 219 So. 3d 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …7) (“One not a party to a suit is in privity with one who is where his interest in the action was such thát he will be bound by the final judgment as if he were a party.”); Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew, 511 F. 2d 710, 719 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 210, 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975) (“A person may be bound by a judgment even though not a party if one of the parties to the suit is so closely aligned with his interests as to be his virtual representative.”). See also Stogniew v. McQueen, 656…
  • A.M. Hochstadt v. Orange Broadcast, 588 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …f. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew, 511 F. 2d 710 (5th Cir.1975) (federal law governs question of whether prior federal court judgment based on diversity jurisdiction is res judicata in case brought under federal question jurisdiction), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 210, 46 L.Ed.2d 137 (1975); see generally, 18 Wright, Miller, & Cooper, Federal Practice & Procedure § 4472 (1981 & Supp.1991) (“The res judica-ta effects of a judgment are determined by the law of the court that rendered the judgment.”) (…

Previewing 3 of 62 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw