STANLEY

v.

WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Cara Woods, Jr., 544 F.2d 242 (6th Cir. 1976)
  …t the contents of intercepted communications may be suppressed on the ground that “the order of authorization or approval under which it was intercepted is insufficient on its face.” In United States v. Vigi, 515 F. 2d 290 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 215, 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975), our court considered this argument and held that it was unnecessary to determine whether an acting assistant attorney general who signed the letter authorizing the application could give effective approval under…
• United States v. Garber, 607 F.2d 92 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …within the meaning of section 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. This question of the meaning of “gross income” is purely a legal one, a matter of statutory construction. See, e. g., Haverly v. United States, 513 F. 2d 224 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 216, [*110] 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975). Such a question of law is for the court alone, United States v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 368 F.Supp. 1079, 1083 (M.D.Fla.1973), although the court would certainly be free to consider the opinions o…
• Harold Friedman Inc. v. Thorofare Mkts. Inc., 587 F.2d 127 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …U.S. 596, 608, 92 S.Ct. 1126, 31 L.Ed.2d 515 (1972); Evans v. S. S. Kresge, 544 F. 2d 1184, 1192 & n. 26 (3d Cir. 1976). Furthermore, we are reminded of this Court’s admonition in DeFilippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F. 2d 1313 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 216, 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975), that “ ‘[t]he term “group boycott” . . . is in reality a very broad label for divergent types of concerted activity. To outlaw certain types of business conduct merely by attaching the “group boycott” and “per s…