HARTE

v.

LEHNHAUSEN, FORMER DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Cara Woods, Jr., 544 F.2d 242 (6th Cir. 1976)
  …t the contents of intercepted communications may be suppressed on the ground that “the order of authorization or approval under which it was intercepted is insufficient on its face.” In United States v. Vigi, 515 F. 2d 290 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 215, 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975), our court considered this argument and held that it was unnecessary to determine whether an acting assistant attorney general who signed the letter authorizing the application could give effective approval under…
• Malley-Duff & Assocs., Inc. v. Crown Life Ins. Co., 734 F.2d 133 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …de out where there is concerted action with “a purpose either to exclude a person or group from the market, or to accomplish some other anti-competitive objective, or both.” De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F. 2d 1313, 1318 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 216, 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975). We also note that to the extent the district court further relied on Products Liability in making its determination that a per se violation was not established, its reliance was misplaced. Products Liability in…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Harrikah I. Stanton v. Astra Pharm. Prods., Inc., 718 F.2d 553 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …ss the availability vel non of resubmission under Rule 49(a) as a means of harmonizing inconsistent answers to interrogatories. Nor did Smith v. Danyo, 585 F. 2d 83 (3d Cir.1978); De Filippo v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F. 2d 1313 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 912, 96 S.Ct. 216, 46 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); Franki Found. Co. v. AlgerRau & Assocs., Inc., 513 F. 2d 581 (3d Cir.1975); or Halprin v. Mora, 231 F. 2d 197 (3d Cir. 1956), all cited to us by Astra, reach this issue. . As we have stated in the past, our sco…