ROLLS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gordon, 580 F.2d 827 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …st act pursuant to the same standards provided in the Act in determining whether to schedule a drug. Second, the subdelegation of power is not inherently invalid. See Van Blaricom v. Forscht, 5 Cir., 1975, 511 F. 2d 615, 617 (En Banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915, 96 S.Ct. 222, 46 L.Ed.2d 144 (1975); F. T. C. v. Gibson, 5 Cir., 1972, 460 F. 2d 605, 606, 607; 28 U.S.C. § 510, cited in United States v. Nocar, 7 Cir., 1974, 497 F. 2d 719, 723, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1038, 95 S.Ct. 526, 42 L.Ed.2d 315 (1974).…
• United States v. Melvin, 650 F.2d 641 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …refore does not protect the instant disclosures. In other words, whatever they revealed to Powell, they did so at their peril. The government relies upon the Second Circuit decision in United States v. Gartner, 518 F. 2d 633 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915, 96 S.Ct. 222, 46 L.Ed.2d 144 (1975), where the defendant Gartner and his attorney met with a co-defendant whom they knew was cooperating with the government. Unknown to them, however, was the fact that a government agent was concealed in the closet…
• United States v. Paulton, 540 F.2d 886 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …been delivered on the exact dates appearing thereon or that particular employees may not have cashed their checks immediately after receiving them. 26 CFR § 31.3402(a) — 1; United States v. McMullen, 516 F. 2d 917, 921 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 915, 96 S.Ct. 222, 46 L.Ed.2d 144 (1975). Defendant urges that the exceptions appearing in 26 U.S.C. § 7215(b) unconstitutionally place upon a defendant charged with having violated § 7215(a) the burden of proving his innocence and infringe his privile…