SMALL ET AL.

v.

PANGLE, TREASURER OF KANKAKEE COUNTY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Baker v. State, 336 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 1976)
  …l, because admissions against penal interest have not been recognized as an exception to the hearsay rule in the First District, Francis v. State, 308 So. 2d 174 (Fla.App.1st 1975); Pitts v. State, 307 So. 2d 473 (Fla. App.1st 1975) cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 918, 96 S.Ct. 302, 46 L.Ed.2d 273 (1975), and concluded, “If the proferred [sic] evidence cannot be admitted, it cannot affect the result of the trial.” 319 So. 2d at 610. Petitioner alleges a conflict between the District Court’s decision in this case…
• Schwarck v. State, 568 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …orded a wide latitude in making arguments to the jury particularly in retaliation to prior improper comments made by opposing counsel. Evans v. State, 178 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); Pitts v. State, 307 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 918, 96 S.Ct. 302, 46 L.Ed.2d 273 (1975). Affirmed.…
• Cunningham v. State, 453 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …te v. Murray, 443 So. 2d 955 (Fla.1984); O’Callaghan v. State, 429 So. 2d 691 (Fla.1983); State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980); Hall v. State, 444 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Pitts v. State, 307 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. dismissed, 423 U.S. 918, 96 S.Ct. 302, 46 L.Ed.2d 273 (1975).…