UNITED STATES ET AL.

v.

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1976)
  …of South Dakota reversed [*367] the conviction. 89 S. D. -, 228 N. W. 2d 152. The court concluded that the evidence had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. We granted certiorari, 423 U. S. 923 (1975), and we reverse. (2) This Court has traditionally drawn a distinction between automobiles and homes or offices in relation to the Fourth Amendment. Although automobiles are “effects” and thus within the reach of the Fourth Amendment, Cady v…
• McDONALD v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co., 427 U.S. 273 (U.S. 1976)
  …(1975), noting in regard to the Title VII claim asserted: “There is no allegation that the plaintiffs were falsely charged. Disciplinary action for offenses not constituting crimes is not involved in this case.” Id., at 90-91. We granted certiorari. 423 U. S. 923 (1975). We reverse. II Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits the discharge of “any individual” because of “such individual’s race,” §703 (a)(1), 42 U. S. C. § 2000e-2 (a)(1).5 Its terms are not limited to discrimination [*279] agains…
• Bryan v. Itasca Cnty., 426 U.S. 373 (U.S. 1976)
  …position of such a tax was contrary to federal law. The Minnesota District Court rejected the contention and entered judgment for respondent county. The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed, 303 Minn. 395, 228 N. W. 2d 249 (1975). We granted certiorari, 423 U. S. 923 (1975), and now reverse. I Principles defining the power of States to tax reservation [*376] Indians and their property and activities on federally established reservations were clarified in McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm’n, supra. As summar…