BUSH ET AL.

v.

SEBESTA, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Greater NEW York Hosp. Ass'n v. Blum, 634 F.2d 668 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …(1976 & Supp. II 1978)), primarily as a means of seeking to control the burgeoning costs of federal health care programs, including Medicaid.1 See Ass’n of American Physi [*670] cians & Surgeons v. Weinberger, 395 F.Supp. 125, 140 (N.D.Ill), aff’d, 423 U.S. 975, 96 S.Ct. 388, 46 L.Ed.2d 299 (1975). The statute, which has been amended on several occasions since its enactment, provides for the delegation of review authority over Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement claims to so-called “Professional Standard…
• Pub. Citizen Health Research Grp. v. Dep't OF Health, 668 F.2d 537 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …e Secretary when sanctions are to be made. 42 U.S.C. § 1320C-6. The constitutionality of the PSRO provisions has been upheld by the Supreme Court. Association of American Physicians and Surgeons v. Weinberger, 395 F.Supp. 125 (N.D.Ill.1975), aff'd, 423 U.S. 975, 96 S.Ct. 388, 46 L.Ed.2d 299 (1975).…
• Norberto T. Agustin v. Quern, 611 F.2d 206 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …h care standards” give adequate notice and are not unconstitutionally vague. See Association of American Physicians & Surgeons v. Weinberger, 395 F.Supp. 125, 138 (N.D.Ill.), aff’d sub nom., Association of American Physicians & Surgeons v. Matthews, 423 U.S. 975, 96 S.Ct. 388, 46 L.Ed.2d 299 (1975) (per curiam). We find the same true in this case. Surely plaintiff must have been aware that he was to meet minimal professional standards. IV In his brief, plaintiff makes two additional arguments: (1) that th…