JONES TRUCK LINES, INC.

v.

RYDER TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Atl. Goods Servs., Inc. v. Milan Express Co., 579 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
  …essor and lessee are valid. See Transamerica Freight Lines, Inc. v. Brada Miller Freight Systems, Inc., 423 U.S. 28, 96 S.Ct. 229, 46 L.Ed.2d 169 (1975); Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 507 F. 2d 100 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 983, 96 S.Ct. 391, 46 L.Ed.2d 301 (1975). The indemnity provision involved here specifically declares that Atlantic, as lessor, would indemnify Milan, as lessee, for claims arising out of the negligence of the lessor, its agents, servants or employees…
• Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1984)
  …fully agree with Justice Stevens’ dissent. Nevertheless, I write separately to explain that in view of my continued belief that the Eleventh Amendment “bars federal court suits against States only by citizens of other States,” Yeomans v. Kentucky, 423 U. S. 983, 984 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting), I would hold that petitioners are not entitled to invoke the protections of that Amendment in this federal-court suit by citizens of Pennsylvania. See Employees v. Missouri Dept. of Public Health and Welfare, 4…
• Cnty. of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State, 470 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1985)
  …art and dissenting in part. I join the Court’s opinion except for Part V. I dissent from Part V because I adhere to my view that the Eleventh Amendment “bars federal court suits against States only by citizens of other States,” Yeomans v. Kentucky, 423 U. S. 983, 984 (1975) (Brennan, J., dissenting). Thus, I would hold that the State of New York is not entitled to invoke the protections of that Amendment in this federal-court suit by counties of New York. See Employees v. Missouri Dept. of Public Health and…