UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL.

v.

ISLAND CREEK COAL CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bonifacic DE LA Fuente, 548 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …sulting in an incorrect digit or inversion of digits in target telephone numbers does not invalidate a wiretap application or order. E. g., United States v. Doolittle, 507 F. 2d 1368 (5 Cir.), aff’d en banc, 518 F. 2d 500 (5 Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1008, 96 S.Ct. 439, 46 L.Ed.2d 380; United States v. Sklaroff, 506 F. 2d 837 (5 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 874, 96 S.Ct. 142, 46 L.Ed.2d 105. Similarly, we find no merit in the argument that we should invalidate the wiretap order in the instant c…
• United States v. Perrin, 580 F.2d 730 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …requirement that the defendant either have knowledge of the use of interstate facilities or specifically intend to use interstate facilities. United States v. Doolittle, 507 F. 2d 1368, 1372, aff’d en banc, 518 F. 2d 500 (5 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1008, 96 S.Ct. 439, 46 L.Ed.2d 380 (1975); United States v. LeFaivre, 507 F. 2d 1288, 1296 n.10 (4 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004, 95 S.Ct. 1446, 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975); United States v. Roselli, 432 F. 2d 879 (9 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S…
• United States v. Franklin, 586 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …government “accommodation” to his motion for resentencing to a definite term as an adult offender. . This court has taken the same approach in dealing with two analogous statutes. In United States v. Doolittle, 5 Cir., 507 F. 2d 1368, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1008, 96 S.Ct. 439, 46 L.Ed.2d 380 (1975), the appellants had been convicted of using interstate wire and telephone facilities to carry on illegal gambling operations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952. The district court had “specifically found that two…