YONKERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

v.

MORRIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Yonkers & Yonkers Cmty. Dev. Agency v. Otis Elevator Co. & United Techs. Corp., 844 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …ndowners unsuccessfully challenged the resulting condemnations on the basis that they were not for a sufficiently public purpose. See Yonkers Community Development Agency v. Morris, 37 N.Y.2d 478, 373 N.Y.S.2d 112, 335 N.E. 2d 327, appeal dismissed, 423 U.S. 1010, 96 S.Ct. 440, 46 L.Ed.2d 381 (1975). . Yonkers’ complaint stated claims of implied contract, quasi contract, breach of contract, "bad faith acceptance” by Otis, "fraudulent retention" by Otis and United, and estoppel. . An earlier motion for summ…
• NEW York Times Co. v. Jascalevich, 439 U.S. 1317 (U.S. 1978)
  …ore conclude that I have jurisdiction to act upon that state-court decision.” Id., at 1329-1330. It should also be noted that the Court later found it unnecessary to decide whether the stay had been properly entered, Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 423 U. S. 1010 (1975), but [*1322] that in deciding the merits of the controversy, the Court referred to Mr. Justice Blackmun’s “careful decision” with respect to the stay issue, Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U. S. 539, 544 n. 2 (1976). Of course, Mr. Justi…