GRIFFITH

v.

ILLINOIS; AND LYONS V. ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Riley v. State, 448 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …on common sense and blindly adopt hypertechnical rules, as urged here, which do not remotely serve to protect the substance of the individual’s Fourth Amendment freedom in any way. State v. Nittolo, 317 So. 2d 748, 750 (Fla.), cert. de [*1032] nied, 423 U.S. 1036, 96 S.Ct. 572, 46 L.Ed.2d 411 (1975). B Second, we see no Florida statutory violation in the manner the police executed the search warrant in this case. In this connection, we must differ with our former colleague, Judge Gerald Mager, who conclude…
• State v. LaSALLA, 536 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …at where there was an improper or unlawful act committed by law enforcement officers prior to such abandonment, evidence obtained by the search or seizure is inadmissible. State v. Nittolo, 317 So. 2d 748, 749 (Fla.), cert. denied, Hover v. Florida, 423 U.S. 1036, 96 S.Ct. 572, 46 L.Ed.2d 411 (1975). Thus, in the instant case, to find the evidence admissible, this court would have to conclude that the police did not commit an improper or unlawful act prior to LaSalla’s abandonment of his luggage. In the ins…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Strachan v. State, 578 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …f privacy. The officer observed it, seized it, and properly obtained a search warrant for the apartment. The motion to suppress was correctly denied. See, e.g., State v. Nittolo, 317 So. 2d 748, 749-50 (Fla.), cert. denied sub nom. Hover v. Florida, 423 U.S. 1036, 96 S.Ct. 572, 46 L.Ed.2d 411 (1975); State v. Oliver, 368 So. 2d 1331, 1335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So. 2d 1200 (Fla.1980). Affirmed.…