JONES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Toliver, 541 F.2d 958 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …fendants’ plan since their obtaining the fruits of their fraudu [*967] lent scheme depended on the postal service’s delivery of the unemployment checks to their mailboxes, see United States v. Wolfish, 525 F,2d 457, 460 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059, 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976); United States v. Calvert, 523 F. 2d 895, 904 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 1106, 47 L.Ed.2d 314 (Feb. 24, 1976); United States v. Marando, 504 F. 2d 126 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1000, 95 S.Ct.…
• United States v. Pelusio, 725 F.2d 161 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …Ct. 824,17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). Most of the prosecutor’s excesses, moreover, were not objected to by the defendants and cannot be raised now, absent a showing of plain error. United States v. Canniff, 521 F. 2d 565, 572 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059, 96 S.Ct. 796, 46 L.Ed.2d 650 (1976). No such showing has been made. Lastly, we are persuaded that, absent any evidence that the defendants received the .12 gauge shotgun and the five rounds of ammunition on separate occasions, they could not law…
• United States v. Tripp, 782 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …versible error if the “charge, considered as a whole, includes the principle of the tendered instruction.” United States v. McCarty, 440 F. 2d 681, 682 (6th Cir.1971). See also United States v. Stull, 521 F. 2d 687, 691 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1059, 96 S.Ct. 794, 46 L.Ed.2d 649 (1976). The district court instructed the jury that they were the “sole judges of the credibility of witnesses and the weight and value to be given to their testimony.” A similar instruction was deemed sufficient in St…