LISK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1978)
  …argue that they were “arrested” in constitutional terms as soon as they were ordered from the vehicle and that the search was a fruit of that infringement on their personal rights. See United States v. Lisk, 522 F. 2d 228 (CA7 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1078 (1976) (noted in 64 Geo. L. J. 1187 (1976)), after remand, 559 F. 2d 1108 (CA7 1977). Petitioners never asserted a property interest in the items seized from the automobile. The evidence found was useful to the prosecution solely on the theory that…
• United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1980)
  …may be sufficient in some circumstances to entitle a defendant to seek the return of the seized property if the seizure, as opposed to the search, was illegal. See, e. g., United States v. Lisk, 522 F. 2d 228 (CA7 1975) (Stevens, J.), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1078 (1976), although in that case the property was ultimately found not to have been illegally seized. We need not explore this issue since respondents did not challenge the constitutionality of the seizure of the evidence. The respondents argue that t…
• In re Carter, 618 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …y held. Carter’s complaint clearly alleges tortious conduct under Georgia law, as was established in another appeal during this protracted litigation. Sheet Metal Workers Int’l Ass’n v. Carter, 133 Ga.App. 872, 212 S.E. 2d 645 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1078, 96 S.Ct. 866, 47 L.Ed.2d 89 (1976). The question is whether it also alleges actions within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The International’s removal petition, filed June 14, 1978, discloses its initial position that the allegations of Ca…