EVANS ET AL.

v.

FROMME ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1983)
  …Halbert v. United States, 283 U. S. 753, 757 (1931). See generally United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312, 350-353 (WD Wash. 1974) (describing pretreaty role of fishing among Northwest Indians), aff’d, 520 F. 2d 676 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1086 (1976). I C. Kappler, Indian Affairs 923 (2d ed. 1904). The Order declared that the reservation would be held for the use of the Quinault, Quileute, Hoh, Queets, “and other tribes of fish-eating Indians on the Pacific Coast.” Ibid. Section 5 of th…
• Farmer v. United Bhd. OF Carpenters & Joiners OF Am., 430 U.S. 290 (U.S. 1977)
  …dgment for the defendants and dismiss the action.” 49 Cal. App. 3d, at 631, 122 Cal. Rptr., at 732. The California Supreme Court denied review. We granted certiorari to consider the applicability of the pre-emption doctrine to cases of this nature, 423 U. S. 1086 (1976). For the reasons set forth below we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeal and remand for further proceedings. II The doctrine of pre-emption in labor law has been shaped primarily by two competing interests.5 On the one hand, this Cour…
• Washington v. Wash. State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, 443 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1979)
  …oned until a later date the proper accounting for hatchery-bred fish. 384 F. Supp., at 416-417; 459 F. Supp., [*672] at 1129. With a slight modification,18 the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, 520 F. 2d 676, and we denied certiorari, 423 U. S. 1086.19 The injunction entered by the District Court required the Department of Fisheries (Fisheries) to adopt regulations protecting the Indians' treaty rights. 384 F. Supp., at 416-417. After the new regulations were promulgated, however, they were im…

  ← 1 / 2 →