NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATION OF STEAM, HOT WATER, HYDRAULIC SPRINKLER, PNEUMATIC TUBE, ICE MACHINE & GENERAL PIPEFITTERS OF NEW YORK AND VICINITY, LOCAL UNION NO. 638
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATION OF STEAM, HOT WATER, HYDRAULIC SPRINKLER, PNEUMATIC TUBE, ICE MACHINE & GENERAL PIPEFITTERS OF NEW YORK AND VICINITY, LOCAL UNION NO. 638
424 U.S. 908
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1977)…ry the Court of Appeals had approved for awarding damages; the plaintiffs’ petition challenged the Court of Appeals’ conclusions with respect to the jury instructions and the appropriateness of a divestiture order.7 We granted Brunswick’s petition.8 424 U. S. 908 (1976). II The issue for decision is a narrow one. Petitioner does not presently contest the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that a properly instructed jury could have found the acquisitions unlawful. Nor does petitioner challenge the Court of Appeal…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enter. Ass'n OF Steam, 429 U.S. 507 (U.S. 1977)…30, 1973). A divided Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, set aside the Board’s order. 172 U. S. App. D. C.. 225, 521 F. 2d 885 (1975). We granted certiorari because of an apparent conflict between the Circuits.5 424 U. S. 908 (1976). II In setting aside the Board’s order, the Court of Appeals disagreed with the Board on both legal and factual grounds. We deal first with the Court of Appeals’ proposition that “an employer who is struck by his own employees for the purpo…
-
Local 644, United Bhd. OF Carpenters & Joiners OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 533 F.2d 1136 (D.C. Cir. 1975)…ad been given out. This is essentially an application of the “right to control” approach that was recently repudiated by the en banc decision of this court in Enterprise Association v. NLRB, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 225, 521 F. 2d 885 (1975), cert. granted, 424 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 1101, 47 L.Ed.2d 311 (1976) (No. 75-777). Because I believe that the Board’s reliance on mechanistic formulae diverted it from its duty to appraise the Union’s objective in light of “the circumstances surrounding the creation of this labo…1 / 5
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence