ZEEHANDELAAR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1977)
  …ry the Court of Appeals had approved for awarding damages; the plaintiffs’ petition challenged the Court of Appeals’ conclusions with respect to the jury instructions and the appropriateness of a divestiture order.7 We granted Brunswick’s petition.8 424 U. S. 908 (1976). II The issue for decision is a narrow one. Petitioner does not presently contest the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that a properly instructed jury could have found the acquisitions unlawful. Nor does petitioner challenge the Court of Appeal…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enter. Ass'n OF Steam, 429 U.S. 507 (U.S. 1977)
  …30, 1973). A divided Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, set aside the Board’s order. 172 U. S. App. D. C.. 225, 521 F. 2d 885 (1975). We granted certiorari because of an apparent conflict between the Circuits.5 424 U. S. 908 (1976). II In setting aside the Board’s order, the Court of Appeals disagreed with the Board on both legal and factual grounds. We deal first with the Court of Appeals’ proposition that “an employer who is struck by his own employees for the purpo…
• Carrier AIR Conditioning Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 547 F.2d 1178 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …ight to control” test has been highly controversial, compare majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions in Enterprise Association of Steamfitters Local 638 v. NLRB, 172 U.S.App.D.C. 225, [*1188] 521 F. 2d 885 (1975) (en banc, 5-4), cert. granted, 424 U.S. 908, 96 S.Ct. 1101, 47 L.Ed.2d 311 (1976), has been rejected explicitly by five circuits and perhaps implicitly by our own, see citations in id. at 888-89 & n. 3, and was the subject of recent argument before the Supreme Court, see 45 U.S.L.W. 3276 (U.S…