ARCHER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (67 total)

• State v. Goodley, 381 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …t of authority to the effect that a dog’s sniff is not a fourth amendment search.2 E. g., United States v. Venema, 563 F. 2d 1003 (10th Cir. 1977); United States v. Race, supra; United States v. Bronstein, 521 F. 2d 459 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 918, 96 S.Ct. 1121, 47 L.Ed.2d 324 (1975); United States v. Fulero, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 206, 498 F. 2d 748 (D.C. Cir. 1974) (contrary contention described as “frivolous”); State v. 1969 Volkswagen Bus, 120 Ariz. 365, 586 P. 2d 210 (1978); People v. Campbel…
• Beech v. State, 436 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 1983)
  …a more severe sentence to replace an illegal sentence on its own motion or on motion of the state, Pearce is inapplicable. E.g., Blankenship v. Parratt, 554 F. 2d 850 (8th Cir.1977); Bell v. United States, 521 F. 2d 713 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 918, 96 S.Ct. 1121, 47 L.Ed.2d 324 (1976); State v. Pina, 440 A. 2d 962 (Conn. 1981); State v. Blankenship, 195 Neb. 329, 237 N.W. 2d 868 (1976). However, when a [*84] defendant is resentenced after having the original sentence vacated on the ground th…
• State v. Mosier, 392 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …k, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1972), but it is clear that a dog sniff is not a Fourth Amendment “search.” United States v. Solis, 536 F. 2d 880 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Bronstein, 521 F. 2d 459 (2nd Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 918, 96 S.Ct. 1121, 47 L.Ed.2d 324 (1976); United States v. Fulero, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 206, 498 F. 2d 748 (D.C.Cir.1974); State v. Goodley, 381 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Mata v. State, 380 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Moreover, movement of the su…