ALTENDORF ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
ALTENDORF ET AL.
UNITED STATES
424 U.S. 919
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Enright, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)…he lawsuit itself, a crowded court docket, and the extensive pretrial activity in the case. These are neutral reasons to which we show more tolerance and attach minimal weight. United States v. Mulligan, 520 F. 2d 1327 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 919, 96 S.Ct. 1123, 47 L.Ed.2d 325 (1976). Enright’s assertion that he first sought a prompt trial in March, 1975 does not find support in the record. The first record evidence of his insistence upon a speedy trial is in a motion to dismiss docketed in…
-
United States v. Tranakos, 911 F.2d 1422 (10th Cir. 1990)…that the Sixth Amendment was violated. See United States v. Tercero, 640 F. 2d 190, 195 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1084, 101 S.Ct. 871, 66 L.Ed.2d 809 (1981); United States v. Mulligan, 520 F. 2d 1327, 1333 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 919, 96 S.Ct. 1123, 47 L.Ed.2d 325 (1976); United States v. Shepherd, 511 F. 2d 119, 124 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 514 F. 2d 1072 (5th Cir.1975); United States ex rel. Walker v. Henderson, 492 F. 2d 1311, 1316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 972, 94 S…