ALTENDORF ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1976-02-23
No. 75-5767
424 U.S. 919 Supreme Court of the United States (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Enright, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)
    …he lawsuit itself, a crowded court docket, and the extensive pretrial activity in the case. These are neutral reasons to which we show more tolerance and attach minimal weight. United States v. Mulligan, 520 F. 2d 1327 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 919, 96 S.Ct. 1123, 47 L.Ed.2d 325 (1976). Enright’s assertion that he first sought a prompt trial in March, 1975 does not find support in the record. The first record evidence of his insistence upon a speedy trial is in a motion to dismiss docketed in…
  • United States v. Tranakos, 911 F.2d 1422 (10th Cir. 1990)
    …that the Sixth Amendment was violated. See United States v. Tercero, 640 F. 2d 190, 195 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1084, 101 S.Ct. 871, 66 L.Ed.2d 809 (1981); United States v. Mulligan, 520 F. 2d 1327, 1333 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 919, 96 S.Ct. 1123, 47 L.Ed.2d 325 (1976); United States v. Shepherd, 511 F. 2d 119, 124 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 514 F. 2d 1072 (5th Cir.1975); United States ex rel. Walker v. Henderson, 492 F. 2d 1311, 1316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 972, 94 S…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw