MITCHELL

v.

ALBERTSON'S FOOD CENTER, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …he same acts for which he was charged with being an accessory in the substantive counts. This argument is without merit. Curtis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1977, 546 F. 2d 1188; see United States v. Peterson, 4 Cir., 1975, 524 F. 2d 167, cert. denied, 424 U.S. 925, 96 S.Ct. 1136, 47 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976), 423 U.S. 1088, 96 S.Ct. 881, 47 L.Ed.2d 99 (1976); United States v. Towns, 6 Cir., 1975, 512 F. 2d 1057, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 846, 96 S.Ct. 84, 46 L.Ed.2d 67 (1976); United States v. Tierney, 9 Cir., 1970, 42…
• United States v. Sperling, 560 F.2d 1050 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …s position that concerted action is the equivalent of conspiratorial action. A conspiracy requires “preconcert and connivance”. United States v. Peterson, 524 F. 2d 167, 174 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1088, 96 S.Ct. 881, 47 L.Ed.2d 99 & 424 U.S. 925, 96 S.Ct. 1136, 47 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976). Concerted action, on the other hand, may result from duress rather than agreement. Cf. United States v. Tierney, 424 F. 2d 643, 646 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 850, 91 S.Ct. 53, 27 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970).…
• United States v. Jerry (NMN) Schocket, 753 F.2d 336 (4th Cir. 1985)
  …rial. In this case, the government correctly argues that the appellant waived his constitutional right to be present at his trial. See United States v. Peterson, 524 F. 2d 167 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1088, 96 S.Ct. 881, 47 L.Ed.2d 99, 424 U.S. 925, 96 S.Ct. 1136, 47 L.Ed.2d 334 (1976). The appellant argues that the United States would not have been prejudiced if the appellant’s trial had been postponed until he decided to appear for his trial. The facts convince us otherwise. This case was a…