WILSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Goodley, 381 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …ohan case, supra, was the source of so much justified concern to the dissenter. See also United States v. Venema, supra; United States v. Meyer, 536 F. 2d 963 (1st Cir. 1976); State v. Quatsling, 24 Ariz.App. 105, 536 P. 2d 226 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 945, 96 S.Ct. 1416, 47 L.Ed.2d 352 (1975). . See note 1, supra.…
• United States v. Southard, 700 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …sense and experience’ — insofar as this consists of knowledge beyond the scope of the record in a particular case — can substitute for proof at a criminal trial." Id. at 1382. In United States v. Griffin, 525 F. 2d 710 (1st Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 945, 96 S.Ct. 1414, 47 L.Ed.2d 351 (1976), the issue was whether the government had proven that defendant knew of the court order that he was charged with intentionally obstructing and impeding pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1509. Defendant did not take the st…
• United States v. Pugh, 566 F.2d 626 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …rities the “plain view” was lawful; (2) that the discovery of the evidence was inadvertent, and (3) that the incriminating nature of the evidence was “immediately apparent.” United States v. Wilson, 524 F. 2d 595, 598 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 945, 96 S.Ct. 1415, 47 L.Ed.2d 351 (1976). This standard is met and it is clear that the District Court was correct in admitting the evidence. Given the circumstances of an unlicensed auto operated by an unlicensed driver possessing apparent contraband…