GIESE

v.

HOLT, RINEHART & WINSTON, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …g than one calling for the division of the proceeds of a bank robbery “four ways” among conspirators, a comment we held not to be directly inculpatory of a codefendant in United States v. Hicks, 524 F. 2d 1001, 1002-03 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 946, 96 S.Ct. 1417, 47 L.Ed.2d 353 (1976). See United States v. Grillo, 527 F. 2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1976). In sum, Thomas Warren’s statement was “of peripheral significance at most.” Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. at 87, 91 S.Ct. at 219. It added [*1076] insig…
• United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …ntly, the statements were admissible against Tate as well under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), Federal Rules of Evidence.47 United States v. Archbold-Newball, supra 554 F. 2d at 676; United States v. Hicks, 524 F. 2d 1001, 1002-03 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 946, 96 S.Ct. 1729, 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976). Cf. Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 80-83, 91 S.Ct. 210, 27 L.Ed.2d 213 (1970). Thus, we conclude that the “daytimers” were admissible in evidence against both Gent and Tate. Since they were admissible, it is im…
• United States v. Augustus Charles Bobo, 586 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …nt evidence in the record must also be deleted — has never been decided in this circuit. But cf. United States v. Hicks, 524 F. 2d 1001, 1003 (5th Cir. 1975) (only confessions which “directly inculpate” the defendant must be excluded), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 946, 96 S.Ct. 1417, 47 L.Ed.2d 353, cert, denied, 425 U.S. 953, 96 S.Ct. 1729, 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976). The Sixth Circuit has held that a redaction to replace the defendant’s name with “blank” is not enough if the jury would be compelled by other eviden…