WALKER

v.

COMMITTEE ON EXAMINATIONS AND ADMISSIONS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …ing. In view of this evidence, Fisher’s initial reluctance, or desire to have time to “think it over”, was insufficient, of itself, to negate the evidence of predisposition. See United States v. Reed, 526 F. 2d 740, 743 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956, 96 S.Ct. 1431, 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976). Since there was no evidence to contradict the Government’s evidence of propensity, on the facts before the trial court, Judge Werker was justified in denying a charge on entrapment. United States v. Licursi,…
• United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1982)
  …agent induces a middleman to commit a crime, and the middleman, responding to the pressure upon him, takes it upon himself to induce another person to participate in the crime. E.g., United States v. Reed, 526 F. 2d 740 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956, 96 S.Ct. 1431, 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976). See generally United States v. Valencia, supra, 645 F. 2d at 1178 (explication of Reed facts). . At the Philadelphia due process hearing before Judge Fullam, Errichetti and Criden, testifying under an arrang…
• United States v. Valencia, 645 F.2d 1158 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …rnment agents, the same purpose would not be served by setting guilty men free who were never even in the .agents’ gunsights. Id. at 242-43. When a prior panel of this Court decided United States v. Reed, 526 F. 2d 740 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956, 96 S.Ct. 1431, 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976), it opted squarely for adherence to the traditional rule requiring that the Government have effected the inducement. In Reed, two DEA agents met with an unindicted co-conspirator of the defendant to negotiate th…

  ← 1 / 2 →