PAINE

v.

MCCARTHY, MEN'S COLONY SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Champion Spark Plug Co. v. The Gyromat Corp., 603 F.2d 361 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois is not controlling as a matter of stare decisis, cf. Mercantile Nat’l Bank of Chicago v. Howmet Corp., 524 F. 2d 1031, 188 U.S.P.Q. 353 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 957, 96 S.Ct. 1435, 47 L.Ed.2d 364 (1976), and in view of our disposition of this case, we need not reach this question. . Such a statement, of course, is not responsive to the question of whether persons possessing such skill would have had the knowle…
• Oscar Gruss & SON v. First State Bank OF Eldorado & Philip Kane & Ralph W. Choiser, 582 F.2d 424 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …and cannot be set aside unless the appellate court can “come to a definite and firm conviction that an error [was] committed in the findings . . ..” Mercantile Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Howmet, 524 F. 2d 1031, 1035 n. 3 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 957, 96 S.Ct. 1435, 47 L.Ed.2d 364 (1976). The main thrust of Gruss’ argument is that the Bank acted in bad faith because it “had reason to know of the highly irregular and suspicious nature of the transaction . ”; i. e., that the Bank was on construct…
• Smith v. Mabry, 564 F.2d 249 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …elay that elapsed between appellant’s demand for a speedy trial and his subsequent trial is sufficiently lengthy to trigger a further inquiry into his speedy trial allegations. See Paine v. McCarthy, 527 F. 2d 173, 176 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 957, 96 S.Ct. 1434, 47 L.Ed.2d 363 (1976); United States v. Strunk, 467 F. 2d 969, 971-72 (7th Cir. 1972), rev’d on other grounds, 412 U.S. 434, 93 S.Ct. 2260, 37 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973). The delay is not, however, so inordinately lengthy that it requires an…