TUCKER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, 616 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, 562 F. 2d 1292, 1295 (D.C.Cir.1977) (allowing agency to stipulate to de novo review) with Independent Meat Packers Association v. Butz, 526 F. 2d 228, 239 n.30 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 966, 96 S.Ct. 1461, 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976) (parties cannot consent to de novo review because the district court is not empowered to conduct one.) We need not reach this issue, because we find that the EPA did not waive its right to object to the manner i…
• United States v. Davis, 623 F.2d 188 (1st Cir. 1980)
  …37 U.S. 1, 17-18, 98 S.Ct. 2141, 2150-51, 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978). And it is clear that “a conviction can rest on the uncorroborated testimony of a co-defendant or accomplice”. United States v. Micciche, 525 F. 2d 544, 546 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 966, 96 S.Ct. 1460, 47 L.Ed.2d 732 (1976), rehearing denied, 425 U.S. 985, 96 S.Ct. 2193, 48 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976), quoting United States v. Guy, 456 F. 2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 896, 93 S.Ct. 136, 34 L.Ed.2d 153 (1972), reheari…
• In re Surface Mining Reg. Litig. (three cases). Appeal of Am. Mining Cong., 627 F.2d 1346 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …posed regulations on inflation, employment, and energy supply and demand, and establishes criteria for identifying regulations that may have such an impact. In Independent Meat Packers Ass’n v. Butz, 526 F. 2d 228, 236 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 966, 96 S.Ct. 1461, 47 L.Ed.2d 733 (1976), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that “Executive Order No. 11821 was intended primarily as a managerial tool for implementing the President’s personal economic policies and not as…