BELANGER

v.

MATTESON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Joseph v. State, 642 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …stablishing various rules to govern the conduct of participants. McMillan v. State, 258 Md. 147, 265 A. 2d 453 [ (1970) ]; LaRocca v. Lane, 47 A.D.2d 243, 366 N.Y.S.2d 456, aff'd, 37 N.Y.2d 575, 376 N.Y.S.2d 93, 338 N.E. 2d 606 (1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 968, 96 S.Ct. 1464, 47 L.Ed.2d 734 (1976). However, the rule of Sherbert is that restrictions on religious practices are permissible only where the practices threaten public safety, peace, or order. We do not believe that wearing a prayer cap in court t…
• Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …Industries, Inc. v. American Excelsior Co., 517 F. 2d 714, 721-22 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 1411, 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); M.C. Manufacturing Co. v. Texas Foundries, Inc., 517 F. 2d 1059, 1066 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 968, 96 S.Ct. 1466, 47 L.Ed.2d 736 (1976); Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. FTC, 371 F. 2d 277, 281 (7th Cir. 1966). Indeed, the allegations of adverse competitive effect are related only to the change in Sweeney’s pickup point from Westville to Macungie.…
• H & B Equip. Co., Inc. v. Int'l Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …3 (1963), it does so subject to the peril that the proof may show an independent reason why the plaintiff’s bid would not have been accepted. M. C. Manufacturing Co. v. Texas Foundries, Inc., 517 F. 2d 1059, 1063-1065 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 968, 96 S.Ct. 1466, 47 L.Ed.2d 736 (1976). A failure to show a specific monetary loss will defeat the plaintiff’s case, Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 514 F. 2d 690, 697 (5th Cir. 1975) , cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 1412, 47 L.Ed.2d 34…